Thursday, July 25, 2013

MISPLACED APPROVAL




*



MISPLACED APPROVAL


Dr. Rajendra Pandian
Former Governing Council Member

It is heartwarming to note that all our American friends associated with the college— missionaries and others alike—without exception, have been lending their fullest support to the college in different ways and at different levels since the outbreak of the problem. Dr. Charles Ryerson, Emeritus President of the American College Endowment Fund wrote to the Bishop: “Any change [in the traditional management of the college] could force the trustees to re-evaluate their financial and moral support to the college” (saveamericancollege, April 23, 2008); Dr. Riesz, the President of the Trust has often repeated the idea: “Why does the CSI need to have control over this 129year old college?” (americancoll, May 24, 2012). 

Dr. Carl Jacobson, Executive Director of the Oberlin-Shansi Foundation also wrote (saveamericancollege, April 21, 2008) that such aggression on the institution (as orchestrated by the late Bishop Asir and his son-in law Dr. Davamani Christober, the then Bursar and the present Principal) might result in the “termination” of the “historic relationship” (April 21, 2008) between the Foundation and the college. Describing the violence on campus as a “total nightmare” (March 15, 2011) he urged everyone to act and “save the college’. His statements were timely, categorical, and honorable and perceived as the official stand of the Oberlin-Shansi Foundation on the American College issue. 

As the fight aggravated Oberlin-Shansi suspended the exchange program with the American college and subsequently we have seen no Oberlin Rep or Director on campus these years.  We will remember with gratitude and admiration the pro-college stand taken by our overseas associates such as the Board of Trustees and the Oberlin –Shansi Foundation; I even opined once that our governments and law courts should get to know the sentiments from these quarters which might help us consolidate the larger view in favor of the college. Even amid the unprecedented scale of thuggery and campus-violence unleashed by the very same ‘administration’ we remain resolute thanks to the empathy and support that our friends have extended to the college through fitting words and timely deeds.  

Against that backdrop, the visit of the Chair and the ED of the Oberlin Shansi foundation to our campus gains importance.  I knew it only as lecture in SCILET delivered by Dr. Anuradha Needham, a professor from Oberlin. And I learn that  it entailed all forms of courtesy: the guests sharing the dais with the Principal; visiting him in his office; partying in the evening with the ‘administrators’ and select Oberlin Fellows indicating signs of the possible revival of exchange. While welcoming the Shansi friends in our midst [and thanking them for the visit] we must also admit that we are surprised at the timing of their trip. This may accord enormous approval on the wrong people; strengthen their claim to legitimacy and thereby undermine the struggle to restore the college—I’m afraid!


*

16 comments:

  1. RP,
    normally all Shansi fellows among faculty would be invited. how come this time only some //select Oberlin Fellows//??

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dear Pandian: Yes, I agree with your conclusion, yet look forward to the possibility that the Oberlin visitors will share with the Trustees of the Endowment Fund the conclusions they have drawn from their experiences first-hand. This will surely help the Trustees as we wonder what our relationship with A.C. should be.'

    Mrs. Riesz and I have just experienced a "Golden Reunion" of Old Boys, celebrating 50 years of Post-Graduate Physics at the College. Though a small number, the respect and affection for the College and their experiences there were abundant. Cannot the CSI see this too?

    Prof. R.P. Riesz

    ReplyDelete
  3. Dear Pandian:

    Yes. I agree with your conclusion, yet I have a hope that the Oberlin visitors will share their first-hand experiences with the Trustees of the Endowment Fund. this may help the Trustees to find a correct relationship with the College.

    Mrs. Riesz and I have just returned from a Washington D.C. "Golden Reunion" with a small number of Old Boys, celebrating the 50th anniversary of Post-Graduate Physics. The enthusiasm and respect they exhibited for the College was enormous. Cannot the CSI see this also? Yet the current administration did not see it possible to hold this event at the College?

    ReplyDelete
  4. so sad to see this new development, especially when the church is so vehement in robbing the college of its tradition and status.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Whether the visit of the Oberlin-Shansi people to the American College was pre-planned or accidental, formal or informal, such a visit, at this juncture, when the College administration is in the hands of an illegal Principal, who is bent upon changing the fundamental structure and character of the College, is bound to be viewed as a step in the wrong direction of legitimising the illegitimate. May be, they have been misled or misinformed by an interested few.
    The Oberlin-Shansi would do well to stick to its declared decision of supporting the struggle to save the College, till the end. Let the flicker of hope turn into a flame.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Had golden moments in the american college 25 yrs.ago as a student. met oberlin fellows in the campus and AC was an epitome of friendship,culture,tradition and education.Have to restore the old campus and tradition of the college.-bagyalakshmi,student 1986-88.dept.of zoology.

    ReplyDelete
  7. It is unfortunate that Shansi officials have done what Prof. Rajapandian has described in his post. What they have done is wrong. Their visit I would say is adding fuel to fire and weakening the interest of American Missionaries work keeping the College independent of the local Church. This however is not the first time Shansi is making a mistake. A few may remember that Shansi program was suspended by Government of India for some years for a mistake of one of the Shansi reps (I know the person but I don't want to mention it here) and now it is the officials. Shansi keep off and don't give a stamp of your approval to the present administration of the College that is still not the legitimate administration.

    ReplyDelete
  8. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Save American College. It looks as though the College has to be saved from people half way around the globe as well.

    ReplyDelete
  10. An official response from the Oberlin-Shansi Association to the article and comments would be greatly appreciated.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Persons like Prof DSL who are Shansi Fellows should write to Shansi immediately condemning the present action. It is important. Note here Dr. Riesz has asked the Oberlin people to share their first hand experience with the trustees. Since they have not met all the faculty (sane and insane) what is the guarantee that they tell the truth?

    ReplyDelete
  12. Dr. RAJENDRA PANDIAN writes ....

    I hope an interaction between Shansi and the Trustees will do.

    ReplyDelete
  13. To complete Rajendra Pandians sentence....harm to the College.

    ReplyDelete
  14. 94 ENG 12
    I have been reading the posts for quite a long time. I feel this is the right time to express our protests against the vested interests. SAVE THE AC Should Be Everyone's Motto.

    ReplyDelete
  15. 94 ENG 12

    I have been reading the posts for quite a long time. I feel this is the right time to express our protests against the vested interests. SAVE THE AC Should Be Everyones Motto.

    ReplyDelete